Sydney suburbs earmarked for high-rise blocks      Leesha McKenny, 15 March 2013

activation map

Bill  Randolph's PictureBill Randolph, from the University of NSW’s City Futures Research Centre, said the precincts were located in the right areas.

Admin Comment in response:

The original Metrostrategy – “City of Cities” – focussed on Blacktown, Burwood, Campbelltown, Chatswood, Hurstville, Liverpool, Parramatta and Penrith. The idea was to create fully functioning stand-alone cities within the Sydney Basin. Each of those cities needed major health,education, transport and recreational facilities. Having the airport, port, major teaching hospitals,3 of the top universities, and major recreation (beaches, botanic gardens, centennial park) in the one relatively small subregion of the basin – the East – is the big problem. Density is already high in the East and that’s without factoring in commuting workers and recreational visitors. Packing more people into the East around Mascot, Maroubra and Randwick will make it more difficult for the majority who live in the rest of the basin to access existing facilities. While parkland experiences can be delivered in the west we need to ensure that people have easy access to attractions like beaches that are only available in the East. Open space is a priority. A second airport to service the west is long overdue. There should be a priority to improve hospital facilities in the west. Education is changing with technology so the need for more campus space in the East should be examined closely before facilitating growth. The biggest ‘grower’ in the East is the Port – Freight is projected to grow around 10 times everything else – see http://www.infrastructure.nsw.gov.au/state-infrastructure-strategy.aspx We need a smart freight plan which utilises Kembla, Newcastle and Parkes and puts a lid on Port Botany. We don’t need residential growth right next to Australia’s largest airport and second largest container port. We need a buffer. Growth for Mascot is a bizarre notion and even South Maroubra is only 10 minutes from the Port/Airport complex.

Eight suburbs have been earmarked for high-rise apartment blocks up to 30 storeys tall and increased commercial development as part of a state government plan to boost high-density housing and employment in Sydney.

Fairfax Media has identified the eight “urban activation precincts” – where development is to be intensified near transport hubs – due to be unveiled by the Premier Barry O’Farrell and Planning Minister Brad Hazzard.

Parts of North Ryde, Macquarie Park, Epping, Wentworth Point, Sydney Olympic Park, Mascot, Randwick and South Maroubra are facing a raft of zoning and development control changes encompassing hundreds of homes and businesses, as well as government-owned or council land.

The effects of the highly anticipated changes are already being felt. Chris Dunkerley from the Epping Civic Trust said developers and real estate agents were doorknocking his neighbourhood, where single-storey dwellings are facing a likely rezoning for five storeys.

While some of Epping’s existing houses will be protected by a heritage conservation zone, Mr Dunkerley said new controls were expected to increase maximum building heights, ranging from 3 to 22 storeys.

In North Ryde, 30-storey buildings have been mooted.

In the Randwick and Ryde local government areas – which will host education precincts around the University of NSW and Macquarie University respectively – public housing estates have also been earmarked for possible redevelopment.

Bill Randolph, from the University of NSW’s City Futures Research Centre, said the precincts were located in the right areas.

“If this doesn’t work then we’re really stuck as a city,” he said. “We have to activate urban renewal across the city, and we’ve got to do it appropriately.”

But Professor Randolph said the authorities needed to take heed of the “real traps” that had befallen previous plans, such as overdevelopment in Strathfield and a community backlash in Ku-ring-gai. And he said it would be a concern if the precincts resulted in less affordable housing.

“It’s not just rezone and walk away,” he said. “It’s work with the local community, masterplan the areas, get agreement, and then work with the development sector to develop that agreed plan.”

Councils will be eligible for money from a $50 million fund to help them meet the additional demands that will come from the increased population.

But some of those councils, brought into Department of Planning working groups to develop the detail, have criticised the way precincts were determined.

Randwick’s Labor mayor, Tony Bowen, has said its council had “no input whatsoever” in nominating its two precincts. Nor did Auburn City Council, which likened the process to the “removal of local planning powers and decision making from council by the State Government”.

Ryde City Council also expressed concern that heights discussed for development on government-owed land in North Ryde “are substantially higher than the planning controls applying to the adjoining properties in the corridor”.

Mr Hazzard, who declined to comment on the location of the precincts, has previously said they will go out to public consultation once finalised.

“As Planning Minister, I well understand some local councils desire to have no development, or next to no development. This is unrealistic in many parts of Sydney, where the community wants to live.”

2 Responses to “Malabar,Chifley,South Maroubra, Randwick and Mascot identified for high growth”
  1. admin says:

    From Southern Courier: http://southern-courier.whereilive.com.au/news/comments/monorail-a-hit-for-southeast

    Professor Randolph supporting Light Rail over Monorail proposal. Comments on-line:

    KK
    writes:

    Posted on
    17 Oct 11 at 04:30pm

    What Prof Randolph fails to comment on is that the most feasible way to send this light rail to link up with Central station is down Flinders and Oxford, then down Pitt St and up Castlereagh. This will invariaby cost as much, if not more than monorail due to absolutely stuffing around of traffic conditions. A dual direction monorail that continues all the way to Maroubra Jn with a branch past the Racecourse to Randwick and POW Hospital services St Vincents, SCG/SFS, Fox, Racedays, UNSW and POW, and would not be stopped by peak hour traffic. Plus, how many buses does it eliminate the need for?

    franco petrella
    writes:

    Posted on
    7 Oct 11 at 11:49am
    Excellent idea. Just got to make it pretty.

    Jon Kondor
    writes:

    Posted on
    6 Oct 11 at 02:36pm
    As stated in my letter, the advantages by far outweigh the negatives. Of course there’s going to be expense! With both systems; but please think of the future and don’t clog up our roads with more ON ROAD solutions that are immovablle.

    Eric Tierney
    writes:

    Posted on
    6 Oct 11 at 01:10pm
    What streets between Central and Moore Park do the supporters of monorail plan to put pylons along. Or do they intend to bless the gay strip of Oxford St with the snaking edifice. Randwick Council has also failed to face realities with the idea of a one way loop at street level along Belmore Rd. Will UNSW people like to be carried the long way round to go home?

    Bob
    writes:

    Posted on
    5 Oct 11 at 11:30am
    Could not agree more with Jon Kondor,the monorail has to be the way to go. Light rail may sound good, but how on earth can you get it to work in with the transport system we have at present is beyond me. Having lived in cities that were built around a light rail systems, they work well. But, if one thinks they can impose a light rail system from the City to Randwick and beyond without major headaches to the existing transport, I don’t think so. And with regard to the asthetics of monorail versus light rail, would not the proposed light rail have overhead power lines? Just what we need more power lines overhead – surely not. The opportunity to build light rail to Randwick was lost quite some time ago when the Council permitted buildings to be built along the corridor that was originally left aside for this sole purpose. Regards, Bob.

    Kim Pedersen
    writes:

    Posted on
    5 Oct 11 at 02:24am
    Randolph “presumes” the cost would escalate with monorail, but what he neglects to mention, as other street rail enthusiasts do, is that monorail operating and maintenance costs are a fraction of light rail once it’s built. Look at the big picture, then decide. Monorail makes much more sense than trains mixing with traffic and pedestrians.

    Rubens Camejo
    writes:

    Posted on
    4 Oct 11 at 10:39pm
    It won’t happen. Governments are addicted to the fuel excise. Every one driving on our roads to work in preference to public transport is contributing an average of $30pw It would be unthinkable to have a monorail system that travelled from Central to the UNSW via the Moore Park football precinct then onto Maroubra Junction, down Maroubra Road to Eastgardens, then down Fitzgerald Avenue and onto South Maroubra on its way to the beach. Once it got there it would make too much sense for it to continue onto Coogee, Randwick, down High St, back to the UNSW and back along Anzac Pde to Oxford and Liverpool Streets, down Elizabeth back to Central. It would also be unimaginable that the system would run every 3 minutes in peak hours and every 10 minutes off peak AND it having a duplicate line so that the system run both ways.

    The whole thing would be devastating because it might just work. Hell, other areas such as Bronte, Bondi, Watsons and Doubles Bays might want such a system. What of the peninsula up north; they might even be able to do without a new Spit Bridge. Suburbs adjacent Victoria and Parramatta Roads might also want such a system if it is shown to work in the east.

  2. Andrew Roydhouse says:

    Has anyone else spotted that Randwick is the odd one out?

    Every other new “precinct” either has existing HEAVY RAIL (capacity to move people that is) and other supporting infrastructure or ferries (not subject to road congestion).

    In Randwick’s case we have neither. The much vaunted light rail “promised”, much like the Eastern Suburbs Railway, is not currently planned to go within kilometres of the proposed South Maroubra “Urban Activation” high rise precinct. Funny that.

    With the 800m zone around High St, the proposed light rail WILL NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY to service an additional 25,000 units worth of residents. This figure is derived from using 8 storey units with the median unit size approved by RCC over the past 5 years btw assuming a 15% floorspace per unit block for lifts, corridors, fire escapes etc.

    The lack of existing infrastructure in Randwick is repeatedly denied by our elected representatives. Yet the State Education minister admitted last year that there are not enough places in inner city public secondary schools for the 2012 Year 3 public students to enter Yr 7 in 2016.

    Nearly every Randwick public and private primary school (virtually all in the northern 2/3rds of Randwick) are at or over capacity. Private school principals have held numerous ‘crisis’ meetings with the State Education ministers in recent years to no avail.

    Recently the ‘glassing’ of a man at Coogee Bay was widely reported in the media – did you notice he was taken PAST Prince of Wales Hospital to St Vincent’s Emergency? Why was he taken six times the distance? Because PoW is unable to cope with demand and cannot look after local residents (see recent article in the Southern Courier).

    Many areas in Randwick FLOOD every time there are heavy rains – storm water and sewerage infrastructure is unable to cope with existing demand let alone tens of thousands more units above the over 8,000 additional dwellings approved by RCC since 2004 (when the State Govt required between 800-1,000 by the end of 2013).

    So it is no wonder Randwick was included on the list. If Randwick’s own Council has been so keen to over-develop the area then how can they object to the State Govt getting in on the act? How indeed!

  3. LAPEROUSE » Malabar,Chifley,South Maroubra, Randwick and Mascot identified for high growth says:

    Minh Wollenberg

    I found a great…

  4. LAPEROUSE » Malabar,Chifley,South Maroubra, Randwick and Mascot identified for high growth says:

    Debora Bozzell

    I found a great…

  5. Coque football says:

    Excellent post but I was wanting to know if you could
    write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little
    bit more. Appreciate it!

  6. Google News stand says:

    hey there and thank you for your information – I have certainly picked up something new from right here.
    I did however expertise some technical points using
    this website, since I experienced to reload the web site a
    lot of times previous to I could get it to load correctly.
    I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK? Not that I am complaining, but sluggish
    loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and could damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords.
    Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my email and could look out for much more of your respective intriguing content.
    Ensure that you update this again very soon.

  7. Ernestina Finco says:

    I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You’ve ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye

  8. Google Newspaper Archives Online Free says:

    Can you tell us more about this? I’d want to find out some additional
    information.

  9. google news Today in hindi says:

    First off I want to say fantastic blog! I had a quick
    question which I’d like to ask if you don’t mind. I was
    interested to know how you center yourself and clear your mind before writing.
    I’ve had a hard time clearing my thoughts
    in getting my ideas out there. I do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are generally wasted just trying to
    figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or tips? Thank you!

  10. google newspaper archives Free says:

    What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It absolutely useful and it has aided me out loads.
    I am hoping to give a contribution & help different customers like its helped me.
    Great job.

  11. Www.Scandinavianaturist.Org says:

    I do trust all of the concepts you have offered for your
    post. They are really convincing and will certainly work.
    Still, the posts are very quick for starters. May you
    please lengthen them a little from next time? Thank you for the post.

  12. Http://Www.Scandinavianaturist.Org/Skeppsmyra/Sv/Node/33298 says:

    Hi there, You have done an excellent job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends.

    I am confident they will be benefited from this web site.

  13. google news alerts api says:

    This is my first time pay a visit at here and i am in fact
    impressed to read all at one place.

  14. google newspaper Archives observer Reporter says:

    Hi, Neat post. There’s an issue together with your website in internet explorer,
    may test this? IE nonetheless is the market chief and a
    good component of people will leave out your magnificent
    writing because of this problem.

  15. google news archive search advanced says:

    It’s going to be ending of mine day, except before
    finish I am reading this fantastic paragraph to increase my know-how.

  16. google newspapers Archive search says:

    Hi, this weekend is fastidious in favor of me, because this occasion i am
    reading this great educational paragraph here at my house.

  17. google newspaper Archives blogspot says:

    An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a
    colleague who was doing a little research on this.
    And he in fact bought me dinner because I found it for him…
    lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanks for spending some time to talk about this matter
    here on your site.

  18. google news top stories says:

    Hi there friends, how is everything, and what you would
    like to say about this article, in my view its truly remarkable in favor of me.

  19. Google News Alerts Setup says:

    Hi, i think that i saw you visited my web site thus i came to “return the favor”.I’m attempting to find things to improve my site!I suppose its
    ok to use a few of your ideas!!

  20. Http://115861207.Ys.Nb35.Net/Comment/Html/?3860.Html says:

    of course like your website however you have to take a look at the spelling on several of your posts.

    A number of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very troublesome to inform
    the reality nevertheless I will definitely come again again.

  21. google news usa sports says:

    I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it
    up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future.
    Cheers

  22. Google news apple Watch says:

    We stumbled over here coming from a different web address and thought I might check things
    out. I like what I see so now i’m following you.
    Look forward to checking out your web page repeatedly.

  23. Guanyusjc.Com says:

    I don’t even understand how I finished up here, however I assumed this put up was once
    great. I do not realize who you might be but definitely you’re going to
    a well-known blogger in the event you are not already.
    Cheers!

  24. what happened to Google newspaper archives says:

    Hi there, the whole thing is going nicely here and ofcourse every one is sharing information, that’s really excellent, keep up writing.

  25. Google News Today In Hindi says:

    I’m not sure where you are getting your
    information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time
    learning more or understanding more. Thanks for fantastic information I was looking for this information for my mission.

Leave a Reply